Thursday, March 3, 2011

La Mer Characteristics Fake

genocidal The new law of the United States: Home Food Outlaw (S510)

tract and translated by: AltraNews
source: off-midgard.info

fence under construction in the electronic concentration camp, which aims to make every person is completely under control, there are still many gaps that allow you to escape all-seeing eye of Big Brother. One of the most obvious is to get out of the company and the best empowerment.
In recent years, the United States for example, the movement has spread so-called isolationists. People in small communities and families are leaving the company to live in remote forests and mountain areas living by farming, fishing and hunting. But it seems that in this there is an attempt to end it.
The U.S. Senate has introduced a bill, the S510, which in fact would make it illegal cultivation, use, distribution, purchase or sale of food grown at home. All this, of course, is done under the pretext of protecting the health citizens by ensuring that crops grown in private often do not meet sanitary standards, and therefore threaten the health consumers.

Experts the bill for the revision of food safety (S510), the law could be more dangerous in U.S. history.

Dr. Shiv Chopra, a recognized authority on food safety said: " If adopted, the S510 would violate the right of citizens to the cultivation, possession, trafficking in food and especially to eat healthy foods. It will be the most horrible act against the growing of food and agricultural products. The bill is unconstitutional and contrary to natural law, or, if you will, the will of God ".

It is worth mentioning that in 1990 Bill Clinton introduced the provisions of the Hazard Analysis Control Point (HACCP), ostensibly to fight infections in the meat industry. This position is openly lobby for the interests of producers of beef and the World Trade Organization as a "control" themselves, excluding and eliminating competitors from the market, that is thousands of small producers of meat.

In 2008 Hillary Clinton during her election campaign has insisted on the creation of a powerful centralized agency for food safety. Although it did not become president, his idea was developed in the S510.

So, this bill violates the fundamental principles of moral survival, social, economic, political, constitutional and human, according to the American human rights activists. They draw attention to the following issues: the bill, if approved, provides for a total capacity of the Ministry of the safety of all foods and all U.S. companies, which among other things, creates a favorable base for corruption and the lobby.

In fact, the law will end the sovereignty of the United States submits to the WTO, threatening national security. This in turn eliminates the Act 1994, signed in Uruguay, which places the sovereignty and the law under U.S. protection. The S510 proclaims the priority of international standards on nations, stating that nothing in this Act (or the amendments made to it) can be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with the agreement established with the WTO.

Moreover, the law will allow the government, in accordance with the law of war, to consider the sale of any food (even grown in the U.S.) and even sharing them as "contraband" in the United States, stating with this right that the U.S. is not a territorial entity.

The bill allows the UN, WHO, the Organisation of the Food and Agriculture Organization and the WTO to take control of all food on Earth and interfere with access to traditional natural foods. His bizarre story and expected impact with limited tolerance to the natural diet (with the approval of genetically modified foods, genetically modified animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food and so on) is a huge threat to human health and prevents the normal supply.

It would seem that this is a purely American event, which has nothing to do with us. However, the logic of events, their global reach, as well as the sad experience of the last two decades, as well as the insistence of the leadership in the WTO, suggests that such a law would soon be introduced for discussion in the Duma. So, quietly, without fanfare. After the introduction of electronic identity.

article from: http:// eliotroporosa.blogspot.com


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pT46lmKMbQ

0 comments:

Post a Comment